2018 Long Range Weather Forecast for Texas-Oklahoma


Search for Other Locations

Enter a Location

See long range weather forecasts for the next 60 days from The Old Farmer’s Almanac! Our long range forecasts can be used to make more informed decisions about future plans that depend on the weather, from vacations and weddings to sporting events and outdoor activities.

To see long term forecasts for the entire year, pick up a copy of the annual Old Farmer’s Almanac, available online and in stores.

Note: Long range forecasts are regional, not city-specific. If your city is located inside a region, the region's forecast will apply to you.

Free 2-Month Weather Forecast

March 2018 Long Range Weather Forecast for Texas-Oklahoma
DatesWeather Conditions
Mar 1-8Showers, warm
Mar 9-14Sunny, cool
Mar 15-18Heavy rain north, sunny south; cool
Mar 19-26Showers, warm
Mar 27-31Sunny, cool
Marchtemperature 60° (1° above avg.)
precipitation 3.5" (2" above avg. north, avg. south)

April 2018 Long Range Weather Forecast for Texas-Oklahoma
DatesWeather Conditions
Apr 1-5Rain, then sunny, cool
Apr 6-12Rainy, mild
Apr 13-17T-storms north, sunny south; warm
Apr 18-22Sunny, cool
Apr 23-30Scattered t-storms; warm, then cool
Apriltemperature 65° (1° below avg.)
precipitation 5" (2" above avg.)

Annual Weather Summary: November 2017 to October 2018

Winter will be colder than normal, with above-normal precipitation. The coldest periods will be from late November into early December, from late December into early January, and in early February. Snowfall will be near to above normal, with the snowiest periods in late December and early to mid-February. April and May will be cooler and rainier than normal. Summer will be cooler and rainier than normal, with the hottest periods in mid-July and mid-August. Expect a hurricane threat in late August. September and October will be warmer and rainier than normal. Watch for a tropical storm threat in early September.

Map showing Old Farmer's Almanac long range weather region number 11

About the Texas-Oklahoma Region

The Texas-Oklahoma long range weather region includes all or part of the following states: NEW MEXICO (Eunice, Hobbs, Jal, Lovington, Portales), OKLAHOMA (Broken Arrow, Lawton, Norman, Oklahoma City, Tulsa), TEXAS (Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio).

Texas-Oklahoma Neighboring Regions

Here are the regions that neighbor the Texas-Oklahoma long range weather region:

Temperature and Precipitation November 2017 to October 2018

Temperature and Precipitation Graph

Reader Comments

Leave a Comment


Your prediction were completely wrong for January it was cold and icy with snow try getting into another line of work dog was right on

Not wrong

Too stupid to read a graph are we? They forecasted cold and the graph says so, too.

Farmers Almanac's 80% traditional accuracy

Keep up the good work. Our sun dwarfs the earth, as it is 109 times the diameter of our Earth. It emits sun spots and solar flares in cycles that produce energies of 100 million megaton bombs exploding at once, which the Earth receives this heat within 8 minutes. As we orbit the sun which produces an equivalent energy of 240 trillion hp, as we travel through spring, summer, fall and winter at approximately 66,000 mph, thus causing jet streams in our atmosphere prevailing mainly west to east at wind speed of 150 to 250 mph. Then the thought of man-made global warming and/or controlling the the climate of the Earth, I THINK NOT!!!

Jan 16, 2018 comment

Your comment is spot on! Thanks!

Well now... I believe that

Well now... I believe that certainly puts it in perspective; and, to think meteorologists are able to predict weather as well as they do with all those dynamics going on.


Earth receives a tiny fraction of the energy from the sun (since it isn't a Dyson sphere), so the sun's TOTAL energy output isn't really relevant to anything.
You certainly haven't addressed the data, which clearly show a rise in average global temperatures, but you also ignore every part of the basic theoretical argument: changes in our atmospheric composition affect the proportion of that energy which is immediately or eventually reflected, contributing to direct warming and polar ice melts. White ice melting causes the release of trapped gasses and increases the amount of darker (i.e. more light and heat absorbent) material that is exposed to the sun's rays, accelerating the effect. If you bother to look, you can find plenty of examples of vicious cycles like this in nature, where tiny inputs plus time add up to big eventual changes. It's not so far-fetched. And copy/pasting a bunch of statistics you found somewhere does not make for an enlightened argument.
I take it you watch Fox News, or possibly even Breitbart. Don't you think its sad and kind of scary that I'm able able to guess a people's political beliefs (with high accuracy) knowing only their opinions on what should be a totally unrelated scientific issue?

And given your reply, you

And given your reply, you obviously watch msnbc. Call me a psychic!


No, I read books, long-form articles, and primary documents from a variety of sources, because watching cable news is for old people who don't like to think too hard, and prefer their opinions to be handed to them, fully formed, by wealthy media moguls.


It is interesting that you claim the view of a scientist, yet you presume to guess political views of someone based on "a totally unrelated scientific issue". This is interesting to me because in my narrow observation of people, I find political views to adhere unreservedly along the talking points of one party or other. People do not appear to actually think independently yet most really seem to believe that they do. Talk about scary, this personal deception seems to be rampant yet unnoticed, by most everyone. Especially scary is it seems to be worst among those of a "scientific predisposition" yet it is the opposite of a scientific method of observation. I would dare you to presume which political party I belong to or which shows I watch or which white papers I read, the fact that I recognize this deception, is the simplest form of avoiding it.

Science? Really?

Mr Stats,
Well, I am a Scientist of sorts. I did take all this in college but one thing I do remember is your tests and theories are only as good as your data. I am a computer Scientist. I know that computer models are only as good as the code and data. See, I read the list of Scientist that agreed with the warming cycle the data presented. Most of them had nothing to do with climate or weather or even the atmosphere. A real Scientist would gather data themselves and test for themselves. SO in reality they were just agreeing with the one guys theory. Global temps have only been taken accurately for about 30 years on a planet that is billions of years old. I mean the weather man cant even get the forecast right the day before, not in Texas anyway. They are depending on computer models to much. The 70's cooling was caused by volcanoes as the little ice age was. It is natural for warming to occur between cooling periods. I mean that's logic right? If you guys had all the weather data from the last ice age to date your computer models would show something totally different and thats a fact. Cold is the absence of heat and vise versa.