Primary Image
Image Credit:
M.Vich/Shutterstock
More Like This
I live in Florida and would prefer DST to stop and stay on standard time all year long. The reality is that we only have so many hours of daylight in the winter, and it's a school safety issue for children to be going to school in the dark. Many people are working at home now, and so driving home in the dark isn't as much of an issue. Many people are home by dinner time when it is dark anyway. People are thinking of tourism here in Florida, but not about children's safety in the morning. I don't understand why people are actually thinking they are getting more sunlight. It's better as far as reducing energy consumption. We need to just stay on standard for the entire year and get rid of DST!
Why on earth would Californians and other Pacific coast places want to be on Denver time? Mountain time zone is what we are equal to on PDT, and the place where that is closest to ‘real’ sun time is Denver (or, to put it another way, Denver is on the central meridian for its time zone.). California is actually very close to sun time when we are on Standard time, so let’s stay that way. Agreed this going back and forth is annoying. Let people who really want to do it adjust their own hours.
Thanks for an informative article. Even if DST is abolished, businesses and schools in various localities could adjust their schedules to times most appropriate to their region. While that might introduce more confusion, it is under local control. Today with international businesses and sports across time zone lines, we're getting used to scheduling with colleagues and friends taking into account their local time. While I personally like later sunsets. One would think that retirees could set their own time, but somehow we still seem to get forced into the local construct.
As A professional driver, I would prefer DST to be permanent, Why? Because People are well rested in the am and driving to work in the dusk are less likely to have an accident than they are driving home in the dark in a fatigued state. Also it gives people more time to enjoy the outdoors after work.
I prefer DST. Come on Nevada. End this annoying time change now so we don't have to fall back in November
I prefer permanent DST. Winter evenings are too long and dark on standard time. Every time change takes me two months to fully adjust.
I prefer permanent DST. Once a person leaves work, it gives time to spend with family outside, or other activities.
I love daylight saving time I hope it will co tinue to stay on daylight saving time...i do a lot of yard work so i like that it doesnt get dark early plus i like to sleep late so having the sunlight late in the day is perfect for me and mostly i can go to town later without it getting dark before i get back home...please keep daylight saving time thanks ❤
Ok so DST can be an annoyance and sure it is a "slight" adjustment, but I have to really question the validity of all the arguments presented here against it. The article mentioned some areas that have done away with it, but failed to elaborate on whether and in what ways this really impacted life and made things better. The article says "imagine telling a cow... [they have to get milked an hour earlier, or later]." I somehow do not think this will be a major adjustment for a cow. Yeah I get the whole thing about body clock, but can it be proved scientifically that humans must rise a a particular time or go to sleep at a particular time? Or that a cow must be milked at a certain hour each day? I think the article goes overboard in favor of DST. I am not commenting to present an argument against it. I am just saying. I do think people enjoy that extra hour of daylight at the end of the day, especially in a society in which so many are on the daily work schedules we have. Bottom line I don't see that it is really such a big deal, more like an small, short lived annoyance we go through twice a year. Please present some evidence on real benefits in areas that have eliminated it. With the schedules we keep these days, it actually seems more likely people people would benefit from additional daylight at the end of day (after they get out of work or school) than before. As for any "depression" noticed after the fall change this may just be related to the fact we are going into winter and overall experiencing more cold and less sunshine. So the article puts out a thought worthy argument, but does not seem to be able to substantiate these arguments in amounting to much of anything.
I have read many of the comments concerning Daylight Saving Time verses Standard Time and the actual act of changing the clocks. I can honestly say I see both sides of the argument. What it appears everyone agrees on though, is the disruptive time change needs to stop. I'm also pretty certain we can all agree that there is absolutely no way to make everyone happy. The best suggestion I have read so far is to split the difference and then stop changing. For example; if we are now on DST, when the November time change comes about we only go back 30 minutes and then stay put...no more changing. It seems like the most fair solution for all involved.
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- …
- 10
- Next »

Comments