Primary Image
Image Credit:
M.Vich/Shutterstock
More Like This
I love light later in the evenings, and I really don't care if it's dark in the mornings, when I can't enjoy being outside in any event. Early sunsets are depressing.
My strong first preference is year-round DST. Far and away, my last preference is abolishing DST. I would keep the status quo -- time changes -- as a way of avoiding my last preference.
Whatever reasons existed for the original implementation of DST, they are no longer relevant. I always hated it because it took so long for my body to make the shift. Except for the longest days of the year I have always gone to work in the dark and came home in the dark. I hated that my kids had to go to school in the dark when they were just beginning their day. And it took a while for them to make the switch. I envy the animals who follow the light while we foolish humans think we can control time, and nature. Boy, are we stupid.
I think we should have DST year round. Like someone said, there is only about 4 months difference. It’s much more convenient than the other. I live in Kentucky and I love DST!
It's the most ridiculous idea. It's analogous to cutting 6 inches off the end of your blanket, and stitching it to the front of the blanket. When all you really need to do is shift the damn blanket! If people want to change their business hours of operation, so be it! They should have the individual right to do whatever makes the most economic sense FOR THEM. The main problem, as I see it, is that some major corporate businesses don't want to update their posted hours of operation twice per year. They prefer making the entire society change their clocks twice a year instead.
Why bother to change from daylight saving time to standard time. ( Two changes each year ). A pain! Essentially, standard time is only for 4 months, anyways. Why bother. Keep it all year on DST.
Close to 200,000 people have signed to end biannual time changes. Medical experts have cited health risks and the practice is obsolete. #SickofSpringForward or #FinishedWithFallBack
I am a mid Michigan resident and livestock owner and I want the time to change back to standard and STAY there. Here in the north on DST our sunrise wont be until almost 9 am in November and December!!!
Make it easy. The changing of clocks twice a year is senseless. Change it once more by 1/2 hour and leave it there. Those that want DST get half of what they want and those that want Standard time get half of what they want.
My opinion is to end DST. That is, stay on standard time year round, NOT DST. Living in the Pacific Northwest means that in the winter the sun rises very late, almost 8:00AM. Staying on DST would push that time to nearly 9:00AM. Having sunlight in the morning makes it much easier to wake up. Having permanent DST isn't going to make the weather any more pleasant and springing forward in spring leads to increased fatigue and less productivity. If we're tired of springing forward and falling back then we should abandon DST altogether and stay on standard time permanently.
Here in Boston, during the deepest part of the winter, the sun rises at around 7:13am (Standard Time). If we stayed on Daylight time, it wouldn't rise until 8:13am. That seems awfully late, and my kids would be leaving for school an hour before sunrise, and they would be in class for almost 45 minutes already before the sun even rises above the horizon. In the summer, I love the extra daylight time during the evenings when it's warm enough to enjoy being outdoors. While I do dislike coming home from work in the dark, I'd be doing that anyway, even if we stayed on Daylight time year-round (the earliest it sets is 4:11, and that would be 5:11 on Daylight time, when I'm still at work). I'm less likely to go outside when I get home in the winter anyway, because of the cold, so it's not a big deal. Keep it like it is, and we get reasonably light mornings in the winter, and nice long evenings in the summer.
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- …
- 10
- Next »

Comments